Astacus
Well Known Member
- Followers
- 0
- Following
- 1
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Posts
- 109
- Likes Received
- 124
- Name
- Robert Beynon
Just back from Costa Rica, trip number four!
Day 1 - my 600 f4 fell to the ground and split in two.. I had no words, not even bad ones! The 600 was, at the time, attached to the A1 and the 1.4 TC
My second system (A7S3 + 70-200 + TC2) was pulled into play - not so sharp, but the lack of reach was a killer. Put the same combo on the A1, and was surprised that the A1 still apears to be working as pre-accident. And, I used it for almost all of the remaining trip (most of it)
Day 2: We with guide drove back to San Jose and bought the only 200-600 available in the country - thanks IMAX, Thanks Alex (guide, over and above)
Day 3: My mood improved, and all further shots were taken with the 200-600, with several kilos of junk titanium in my luggage. But, I was limited to 200-600, with no chance of adding the 1.4 TC under most lighting conditions, as shutter speed and Af speed struggled at f9.
Initial portents are that the images are excellent, but the keeper rate has dropped, because of slower shutter, especially in the canopy. So it goes.
I would say that the 200-600 saved a holiday, although I was trying to put a brave face on it. The outcome is that I now have an 'imported' 200-600, as well as my domestically purchased on, that I shall sell - it is not fair to sell the import. I will keep the 200-600 though. It is sharp, and the close focus distance, compared to the 600 f4, was important for some shots.
I own the A7S3 because I wanted to spend more time on video. This has been an eye opener for me. I simply cannot manage two systems at once, and will probably sell the A7S3 (less than one year old) at a loss, because it is not being used. So, anyone want an A7S3 and 200-600 combo for perfect wildlife videography.
I did shoot video through the A1 200-600 combo, and if I can stabilise in post, it will be pretty acceptable (all of birds).
Other observations. The iFootage monopod I took to Namibia continues to impress and is a very stable support, whether on the ground or with the camera/lens slung over my shoulder whilst walking trails. The click attach/detach works brilliantly for getting in and out of a vehicle.
The trip was excellent. We had a record number of birds on this trip, broke our Costa Rica record (on eBird) and are now at 508 species, and we broke outr life list during this trip as well. I'll write a trip report inn a separate thread.
TLDR; Costa Rica, Birds, big expensive 600mm lens broken day one, emergency purchase of 200-600, which has performed well in good light. Holiday saved!
ET-1 emerald toucanet, taken on last day in good light, when I was used to the 200-600. 1600 ISO
GHB-1 200-600 early in trip, 2000 ISO, and a reminder to me that no matter what the lens, heat haze is a killer.
Kiskadee - taken with 70-200 @ 200mm with TC2.. looked soft but OK in post.
RS Hawk - 200-600 + 1.4 TC - not too sharp, need some post processing ISO 1600. Background busier than the 600 f4, for sure,
Rob
Day 1 - my 600 f4 fell to the ground and split in two.. I had no words, not even bad ones! The 600 was, at the time, attached to the A1 and the 1.4 TC
My second system (A7S3 + 70-200 + TC2) was pulled into play - not so sharp, but the lack of reach was a killer. Put the same combo on the A1, and was surprised that the A1 still apears to be working as pre-accident. And, I used it for almost all of the remaining trip (most of it)
Day 2: We with guide drove back to San Jose and bought the only 200-600 available in the country - thanks IMAX, Thanks Alex (guide, over and above)
Day 3: My mood improved, and all further shots were taken with the 200-600, with several kilos of junk titanium in my luggage. But, I was limited to 200-600, with no chance of adding the 1.4 TC under most lighting conditions, as shutter speed and Af speed struggled at f9.
Initial portents are that the images are excellent, but the keeper rate has dropped, because of slower shutter, especially in the canopy. So it goes.
I would say that the 200-600 saved a holiday, although I was trying to put a brave face on it. The outcome is that I now have an 'imported' 200-600, as well as my domestically purchased on, that I shall sell - it is not fair to sell the import. I will keep the 200-600 though. It is sharp, and the close focus distance, compared to the 600 f4, was important for some shots.
I own the A7S3 because I wanted to spend more time on video. This has been an eye opener for me. I simply cannot manage two systems at once, and will probably sell the A7S3 (less than one year old) at a loss, because it is not being used. So, anyone want an A7S3 and 200-600 combo for perfect wildlife videography.
I did shoot video through the A1 200-600 combo, and if I can stabilise in post, it will be pretty acceptable (all of birds).
Other observations. The iFootage monopod I took to Namibia continues to impress and is a very stable support, whether on the ground or with the camera/lens slung over my shoulder whilst walking trails. The click attach/detach works brilliantly for getting in and out of a vehicle.
The trip was excellent. We had a record number of birds on this trip, broke our Costa Rica record (on eBird) and are now at 508 species, and we broke outr life list during this trip as well. I'll write a trip report inn a separate thread.
TLDR; Costa Rica, Birds, big expensive 600mm lens broken day one, emergency purchase of 200-600, which has performed well in good light. Holiday saved!
ET-1 emerald toucanet, taken on last day in good light, when I was used to the 200-600. 1600 ISO
GHB-1 200-600 early in trip, 2000 ISO, and a reminder to me that no matter what the lens, heat haze is a killer.
Kiskadee - taken with 70-200 @ 200mm with TC2.. looked soft but OK in post.
RS Hawk - 200-600 + 1.4 TC - not too sharp, need some post processing ISO 1600. Background busier than the 600 f4, for sure,
Rob