Birds Without peaking at the EXIF can you name the lens?

jcastar

Active Member
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Followers
0
Following
0
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Posts
37
Likes Received
45
Name
joel*avery
Country
United States
CREATiVENESS_Nature_20210525_1057122.jpg
 
iPhone 12 Pro?
 
Some flavor of 50mm?
Give us a hint, APSC or Full Frame?
 
FE 55mm f/1.8 ??
 
Joel, on a more serious note, what is so different about this image that makes it unique enough for someone to surmise what lens produced the image? The only thing I see somewhat different is the bokeh ball rings. So I'm curious, what appearance in this image prompted you to pose your question?

Did you make a bokeh ball donut-shape filter for the lens?
 

Attachments

  • Bokeh Rings.JPG
    Bokeh Rings.JPG
    59.8 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
Joel, on a more serious note, what is so different about this image that makes it unique enough for someone to surmise what lens produced the image? The only thing I see somewhat different is the bokeh ball rings. So I'm curious, what appearance in this image prompted you to pose your question?

Did you make a bokeh ball donut-shape filter for the lens?
No, no filters. That's exactly what makes it different.
The bokeh is characteristic of the lenses effect on specular highlights.
 
The bokeh is characteristic of the lenses effect on specular highlights.

Is it my imagination or do I actually see subtle aperture blades in some of those donuts?
 
Is it my imagination or do I actually see subtle aperture blades in some of those donuts?
It's a constant f8 so no aperture blades. They donuts can reflect other scene elements though. That's why the bokeh can get very messy in some pics.
 
Okay, Joel, how long are you going to keep us in suspense? :confused:
 

Minolta 50mm F/1.4 MD, or​

Minolta Rokkor PF 58mm f1.4, or​

Minolta 400mm 4.5​

 
Last edited:
I guess we'll never know....
 
Back
Top