Gaz
Well Known Member
- Followers
- 4
- Following
- 4
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2022
- Posts
- 616
- Likes Received
- 947
- Name
- Gary Finn
- Country
- Australia
- City/State
- Coogee Beach
- CC Welcome
- Yes
Lately I’ve been balking at the crop decisions.
My camera is FF therefore aspect ratio 3:2 - like 35mm film.
Unless it was colour positive film, I always cropped film images for printing.
I can also select in camera 4:3, 16:9, 1:1 but each of these cause the image to be cropped reducing the effective sensor coverage, so I don’t use them, just in case I need that edge in composition later. I think that’s rational. Is it though?
Then I’m faced with an image post production that I crop, knowing I can recover it if I ever wish to.
I look at all the size options and shrug.
Lately I’ve defaulted to 5:7. No reasoning or logic applied. Just like going to the Kodak store and I’ll be back in a week to pick those up. Occasionally I choose 16:9 for 4k monitor and web. Rarely square for instagram since it lets us post portrait now.
What do you generally choose in terms of format?
My camera is FF therefore aspect ratio 3:2 - like 35mm film.
Unless it was colour positive film, I always cropped film images for printing.
I can also select in camera 4:3, 16:9, 1:1 but each of these cause the image to be cropped reducing the effective sensor coverage, so I don’t use them, just in case I need that edge in composition later. I think that’s rational. Is it though?
Then I’m faced with an image post production that I crop, knowing I can recover it if I ever wish to.
I look at all the size options and shrug.
Lately I’ve defaulted to 5:7. No reasoning or logic applied. Just like going to the Kodak store and I’ll be back in a week to pick those up. Occasionally I choose 16:9 for 4k monitor and web. Rarely square for instagram since it lets us post portrait now.
What do you generally choose in terms of format?