Needle of Kent

[evacguy]

StMichael and All Angels looked particularly spectacular today. You can see why she is called the 'Needle of Kent'.

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 70.0 mm
• ƒ/20
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 3200

 

[evacguy]

Another angle on the 'Needle of Kent' also known as St.Michaels and all Angels with the wonderful magnolia tree across the road. Sometimes I wish I had my 50mm lens with me, or perhaps a 35mm lens?

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 70.0 mm
• ƒ/20
• 1/1250 sec
• ISO 3200

 

[FowlersFreeTime]

Another angle on the 'Needle of Kent' also known as St.Michaels and all Angels with the wonderful magnolia tree across the road. Sometimes I wish I had my 50mm lens with me, or perhaps a 35mm lens?
View attachment 35560

I like the colors in this [second] one more, pity you couldn't get the whole structure in frame.

 

[evacguy]

I like the colors in this [second] one more, pity you couldn't get the whole structure in frame.

I agree, that’s why I wished I had my 50mm lens with me, or a 35mm lens.

 

[Cαscαdian]

That 28-200 is above my retirement-pay grade, sad to say - but I watch used prices just in case.
I do have this relatively speedy Σ 28-105 in PK mount, along with their 70-300 Apo from the same pre-DG era; both zoom 'backward' to us non-Canon veterans, but at least they both go the same way! I haven't tested them rigorously as I'm more commonly using Pentax primes - but I should. The 70-300 tested pretty well when it arrived, but the 28-105 has a pretty wide range of scores in its web-wide reviews.

That is quite an impressive needle, by the way!

 

[evacguy]

A normally obscurred view of St.Michael and All Angels.

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 89.0 mm
• ƒ/22
• 1/500 sec
• ISO 3200

 

[evacguy]

That 28-200 is above my retirement-pay grade, sad to say - but I watch used prices just in case.
I do have this relatively speedy Σ 28-105 in PK mount, along with their 70-300 Apo from the same pre-DG era; both zoom 'backward' to us non-Canon veterans, but at least they both go the same way! I haven't tested them rigorously as I'm more commonly using Pentax primes - but I should. The 70-300 tested pretty well when it arrived, but the 28-105 has a pretty wide range of scores in its web-wide reviews.

That is quite an impressive needle, by the way!

Jim, I love the GM 70-200mm f2.8 II so not sure I need a 100mm zoom. What I need though is something at the other end of the range, so the 28-200mm could do the job, but it would have to be significantly better than my GM 70-200mm to get me to move. Alternatively, I just need to get something like a 35mm and carry it around with me. But once again, I'm not a big fan of changing lens in the field. I could go for two cameras, but then I'd have to carry two cameras, and I love how my A7iv and 70-200mm is so light! Guess I may have to put up with my A7iv + 70-200mm + Iphone14 Pro.

 

[evacguy]

St.Mike, look'n goooooood in April afternoon sunshine.

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 94.0 mm
• ƒ/20
• 1/100 sec
• ISO 200

 

[evacguy]

St.Michael looking spectuacular on a Spring day.

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 70.0 mm
• ƒ/22
• 1/80 sec
• ISO 200

 

[evacguy]

St.Michael and All Angels looking devine as a back drop to the white roses.

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 70.0 mm
• ƒ/22
• 1/320 sec
• ISO 100

 

[evacguy]

I edited the above image in PS to try and brighten up the church tower and the clouds. I used the dodge tool - still learning how to use this. What do you think, is it an improvement on the above image?

• ILCE-7M4
• FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
• 70.0 mm
• ƒ/22
• 1/320 sec
• ISO 100

 

[FowlersFreeTime]

I edited the above image in PS to try and brighten up the church tower and the clouds. I used the dodge tool - still learning how to use this. What do you think, is it an improvement on the above image?View attachment 40821

Subtle change, but yes an improvement.