Welcome to Our Sony Alpha Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

One argument for wider DoF at the expense of bokeh.

garuda

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
9
Following
0
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Posts
514
Likes Received
355
Name
Mike
City/State
Illinois
This is a cropped tight closeup that has NO enhancement, no DeNoise, nor any post at all. It was shot with a 7Riv, 135 1.8 GMaster, at iso 100 and f4. By following the conventional recommended theories expressed by the alpha pros (ie.: Sony guru Mark Galer, et al; f1.2-1.8 for max bokeh), but I judge this shot I took today totally unacceptable because of shallow DoF when one eye is near-perfect focus, but the other is quite soft.

Admittedly, I’m not against bokeh at all, but I’m going back my old go-to f-stops of 7-11 for portraits. Regardless of angle of face-to-camera, I prefer the whole head (or at least face) in full focus w a tighter aperture.

.
_DSC04290 DoF Too Shallow.jpg
 
Last edited:
There are different styles of portrait, and a different depth of field is one of the things that changes between styles.

I don’t think I would normally use f/7 to f/11 unless I were using flash, or shooting a crowd. I might well use f/4 but I suspect I would be further away than you must have been to get this effect. How close were you?
 
.... I don’t think I would normally use f/7 to f/11 unless I were using flash, or shooting a crowd......
.
According to DOF calculator for a7Riv & 135 1.8 GM:

35mm Full-Frame @ 135mm f/1.8 at 6-feet gives DOF = .03 inches (50% front/50% behind)
35mm Full-Frame @ 135mm f/5.6 at 6-feet gives DOF = 1.0 inch (49% front/51% behind)
35mm Full-Frame @ 135mm f/11.0 at 6-feet gives DOF = 2.0 inches (48% front/52% behind)

At f/11 the one-inch behind the left eye likely would have put right eye in nearly same focus as left at this angle to lens; I prefer both eyes.
Does this calculation sound correct? And I do often use flash.
 
Sounds right.

Also, f/11 would mean you are getting diffraction effects (there are arguments - some say diffraction starts as early as f/5.6, others say f/8), which adds to the confusion.
 
Several seemingly credible sources claim that f/8 is the real diffraction "sweet spot." But I haven't done much research on this. So who knows?
 

New in Marketplace

Back
Top