The Sony a6400 is the most recent model to be introduced to Sony’s mirrorless APS-C series which also includes the Sony a5100, a6000, a6300 and a6500.
The a6400 brings with it many similar features found within the existing line-up, but also adds some interesting new features that even the range-topping a6500 does not include.
If you are thinking about adding one of these cameras to your gear bag, then you are probably wondering what the differences between them are and which camera is best suited to your needs.
Before we get started here are the announcement dates for each of the cameras:
- Sony a5100 was announced in August, 2014
- Sony a6000 was announced in February, 2014
- Sony a6300 was announced in February, 2016
- Sony a6400 was announced in January, 2019
- Sony a6500 was announced in October, 2016
So now let’s compare 12 key differences between these five Sony mirrorless APS-C cameras and hopefully add a little more clarity to your buying decision.
1. Sensor and Processor
All five cameras feature a Sony APS-C Exmor CMOS sensor with approximately 24 megapixels, the BIONZ X image processor and a front-end LSI. Unfortunately Sony does not provide the exact specifications of their sensors or processors and often just mentions “new generation or newly developed” in their marketing literature.
However, clues about each cameras performance can be attained from ISO sensitivity ranges, autofocus performance, continuous shooting speed and video performance all of which I’ll cover below.
The a6300, a6400, and a6500 all support 14-bit raw output, this compares with 12-bit for the a5100 and a6000. None of the cameras support uncompressed raw, so if this is important to you then you’ll need to take a look at Sony’s A7 series of full-frame mirrorless cameras like the a7 III, a7R III or a9 which do support uncompressed raw.
2. Autofocus
Autofocus is one of the areas where we start to see some differences between the cameras, these differences include the time taken to acquire focus, the number of phase and contrast detection points, as well as features like eye AF, animal AF and real-time tracking.
Both the a6500 and a6300 take 0.05s to acquire autofocus, yet incredibly the a6400 requires just 0.02 seconds, which if you believe Sony’s marketing material makes it the fastest autofocus system in the world at the time of writing. Sony doesn’t mention the AF speeds for the a6000 or the a5100, but I own the a6000 myself and know from personal experience that it is slower than both my a6300 and a6500.
The a6500, a6400 and a6300 all have 425 phase-detection AF points that cover 84% of the image area and help to capture subjects more accurately no matter where they are positioned in the frame. Both the a5100 and a6000 have 179 phase-detection AF points.
When it comes to contrast-detection the a6400 is the clear winner with 425 contrast-detection points, followed by the 169 points for the a6500 and a6300, and 25 points for the a6000 and a5100.
All five cameras support Eye AF (images only), but the new a6400 also allows you to specify 3 different options: left eye tracking, right eye tracking, or auto. It also works automatically when you half-press the shutter button, with the other cameras you need to assign eye AF to a custom button.
Both the a5100 and a6000 only support Eye AF in AF-S (autofocus single shot) mode, whereas the a6300, a6400 and a6500 also support it in AF-C (autofocus continuous shooting) mode.
The a6400 will also receive an update during summer 2019 that will enable Eye AF for animals, making this a dream camera for wildlife photographers. As a wildlife photographer myself there is nothing more annoying than thinking you have nailed the focus only to see that the eyes are out. So personally I’m very much looking forward to this feature which will also be added to the Sony a7 III, a7R III and a9 through a firmware update.
Sony has not said if the a6500/a6300/a6000/a5100 will also receive animal AF updates this year, so I don’t think I’m going to be holding my breath here.
The a6400 manages to trump the other four cameras including the range-topping a6500 with a new real-time tracking feature. With the real-time tracking function you can simply touch the monitor to activate Real-time Tracking for either stills or movies.
The camera will instantly lock onto the target subject and keep it in constant focus. This is possible due to a newly developed subject recognition algorithm that processes spatial information based on color, subject distance (depth), pattern (brightness), and face and eye information at high speed in real time.
Here’s an example of real-time tracking in action.
3. In-body Stabilization (IBIS)
The Sony a6500 is the only camera of the five that includes In-body Stabilization (IBIS). The 5-axis (X, Y, Roll, Pitch and Yaw) image stabilization system compensates for five types of camera shake during handheld shooting of still images and movies.
When you mount a lens that features OSS (Optical SteadyShot) to an IBIS camera body like the a6500, then the camera body only handles the X, Y, Roll and disables its own Pitch and Yaw axis.
I mounted my Sony FE 100-400 OSS lens to both my a6300 without IBIS and my a6500 with IBIS to see if it made any difference, but even at 400mm I didn’t notice any significant improvement in stabilization with the a6500.
So IBIS only really becomes useful if you are shooting with lenses that do not include OSS built in. In this scenario it will help to stabilize your images, especially when using a longer focal length. Sony claims that you can reduce your shutter speed by around 4x and still shoot pin sharp images.
4. EVF and LCD Screen
The a5100 is the only camera from the five that does not include an electronic viewfinder, relying instead on the LCD screen which can be difficult to see in bright sunlight.
The a6000 EVF has a resolution of 1.4 million dots, whereas the EVF on the a6300, a6400 and a6500 all have a much higher resolution of 2.4 million dots.
All five camera feature a 3-inch LCD screen with 921k dots of resolution. However, only the a6500 and a6400 feature touch sensitive screens that allow you to touch to focus. The a6400 touch screen is the most advanced as this also lets you trigger the shutter by touch and also control the new real-time tracking feature by touch.
Only the new a6400 and the a5100 allow you to rotate the screen up 180° for selfies and video logging work. The a6500, a6300 and a6000 only let you tilt the screen up by approximately 90 degrees and down by approximately 45 degrees.
5. Shutter Speed, Continuous Shooting and Buffer
All five cameras can shoot up to a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000s with both the mechanical and electronic shutter.
The mechanical shutter offers the fastest continuous shooting mode on all five cameras. The a6500, a6400, a6300 and a6000 can all shoot up to a maximum of 11fps (Hi+), but at this setting you lose live-view (you see the last picture taken instead of a live view of your scene) and will notice more blackouts on the EVF or LCD screen.
When you select 8fps (Hi) then you get live-view and very short blackouts making it far easier to track subjects such as birds in flight. The a5100 can only shoot up to 6fps in continuous mode.
If you switch to silent shooting with the electronic shutter then the a6400 comes out on top as it can shoot at 8fps, whereas the a6500 and a6300 only support 3fps. Both the a6000 and a5100 do not offer a silent/electronic shutter option.
When it comes to the buffer the a6500 comes out on top as it can record 233 extra fine JPGs or 107 raw files before the buffer is full. The a6400 comes second with 99 extra fine JPGs or 46 raw files. The a6300 manages 44 extra fine JPGs and 21 raw files before the buffer is full which is the same as the a6000. The a5100 surprisingly beats the a6300 and a6000 as it manages 67 extra fine JPGs or 25 raw files before things start to slow down.
6. ISO Sensitivity
Of all the cameras the Sony a5100 and a6000 have the most limited ISO range of 100–25600, but this is still going be plenty for the vast majority of situations. The a6300 and a6500 share the same ISO range that goes from 100 to 25600 and is also expandable to 51200.
The new a6400 trumps all of the cameras with an ISO range of 100-32000 which is also expandable up to ISO 102400. However, in real-world situations it’s unlikely to make too much difference and the image quality at the higher end of the scale is still likely to be very noisy. Still, I’m looking forward to testing this once the a6400 ships (I’ve ordered one).
7. Interval Recording (Time-Lapse)
Sony has a pretty poor reputation when it comes to interval (time-lapse) recording, as none of their cameras include it built in, well at least that was the case until the Sony a6400 came along.
With the a6400 it appears that Sony has finally listened to what their customer base has been asking for, as you now get time-lapse built-in by default which allows you to set an interval of 1-60 seconds between shots. You also get the option of creating a time-lapse movie with the Imaging Edge desktop suite when it’s updated to v1.4 towards the end of January.
Here’s a time-lapse recorded with the Sony a6400. It’s not the most exciting of time-lapses that I’ve even seen, but at least we now have it and I’m sure we will be seeing a lot more awesome time-lapses on YouTube this year 🙂
Although none of the other APS-C cameras here have the time-lapse function built in, you do have a couple of options available. One is to purchase the Play Memories Time-Lapse App which costs around $10. Alternatively you will need to purchase an external intervalometer like the PIXEL FSK *.
8. Video
Sony has really come along way with their video offerings since the a5100 was launched in August 2014 and limited to 1080p (Full HD) at 60/30fps and 24p (50/25/24 in PAL markets). The Sony a6000 also offers the same video specs found in the a5100 and neither camera features a microphone port for connecting an external mic.
With the introduction of the a6300 Sony really upped their game by introducing 4k video recording for the first time in their APS-C camera series. The a6300, a6400 and a6500 all offer 4K video recording at 30fps / 100mbps with full pixel readout and no pixel binning, as well as Full HD at 120fps / 100mbps.
Sony demonstrates the v-logging potential of the a6400 in this promo video.
With the a6300, a6400 and a6500 you also get picture profiles including S-Log 2 and 3, PP1-PP10, Black level, and more, as well as slow motion (up to 5x) and quick motion (up to 60x) that can be recorded in camera in high-quality Full HD. The a6400 is the only camera that includes HLG support that results in better-looking movies.
The a6400 also gets improved autofocus performance for movie recording and touch to track. Both the a6400 and the a6500 are the only cameras that allow you to extract 8mb stills from 4k video footage.
The a6400 is the only camera in Sony’s APS-C series that lets you record a single video for longer than 30 minutes, the other cameras will all stop recording at 29:50.
Pascal Eckhardt demonstrates the 4k capabilities of the a6500 by shooting this awesome cinematic video in Austria.
9. Body Design
All five cameras belong to the same family and therefore share a very similar design. Let’s first take a very quick look at the very exciting dimensions and weights (with battery and SD card):
a5100: 109.6 x 62.8 x 35.7 mm – 283g
a6000: 120 x 66.9 x 45.1 mm – 344g
a6300: 120 x 66.9 x 48.8 mm – 404g
a6400: 120 x 66.9 x 59.7 mm – 403g
a6500: 120 x 66.9 x 53.3 mm – 453g
As you can see the weight jumped by over 50g starting with the a6300, this is because Sony decided to make the a6300/a6400/a6500 dust and moisture resistant.
These measures include sealing around the buttons and dials, as well as a protective double-layered structure that tightly interlocks panels and components. It’s goes without saying that these additional components added some weight. The heaviest of the five cameras is the a6500, this extra weight is largely thanks to the IBIS mechanism.
Sony a5100
Sony a6000
Sony a6300
Sony a6400
Sony a6500
In addition to the new dust and moisture resistant design from the a6300 onwards, the cameras also have a larger grip that makes holding them a lot more comfortable than the a5100 and a6000 which both feature smaller and less ergonomic grips. The a6500 has the largest grip.
When it comes to the physical controls the a5100 is the most basic of the five, and on top of the camera body you will only find a zoom toggle that surrounds the shutter button. There are also less buttons on the rear panel than the other cameras. The a6300, a6400, and a6500 share practically identical controls. However on the a6500 you will find two custom buttons on the top panel whereas both the a6300 and a6400 only have one.
All cameras except for the a5100 feature a hot shoe on top of the body, and all cameras except for the a5100 and a6000 also include a microphone jack for connecting an external microphone.
All cameras also include a built-in pop-up flash, however the a6000/a6300/a6400/a6500 all include additional flash modes including wireless control and high-speed sync (1/160 sec) with compatible external flashes.
10. Menu System
The a5100, a6000 and a6300 all feature menu systems that are not exactly the most intuitive or user friendly of designs. Thankfully a few improvements came to the menu system with the introduction of the a6500 and even more improvements with the a6400.
The a6500 has a redesigned menu with a new categorization scheme. Now, the group name being selected can be found at the screen top, and each tab is colored differently. This allows quick access to desired menu items, which enables you to change settings smoothly even during shooting.
With the a6400 Sony have further improved on the menu by adding My Menu and My Dial features. My Dial lets you assign frequently used functions to the control dial and control wheel for faster access when you’re shooting. Whilst My Menu allows registration of up to 30 different menu items for quick access to menu items you use often, this is a feature that you will find on the a7 III, a7R III and a9 as well.
The a6400 also gets a visualized setup screen for customization. On the custom settings screen, an illustration showing the camera’s operable components shows you at a glance which button or switch you’re assigning, and when you’re setting up the function menu you can view the structure of the actual function screen.
Sony’s menu system may not be the most intuitive of camera menus out there, but thankfully they are taking a few steps in the right direction, even if they are just baby steps.
11. Additional Feature Differences
Here are a few additional feature differences that are worth a mention:
- All five cameras share the same NP-FW50 battery
- The a6400 also gets 1:1 aspect ration
- Only the a6400 and a6500 have bluetooth connectivity for location sharing
- The a6400 gets an additional focus peaking color (blue)
- The a6400 has image protection and ratings
- Only the a6300, a6400 and a6500 have lock-on AF
- Only the a6400 lets you adjust the LCD brightness when shooting in 4k
12. Body Only Price
Please note that prices vary between retailers and there are often special deals running throughout the year. These prices are therefore guide prices for comparison only, please check the latest prices and deals using my price check links at the end of this article.
- The a5100 costs around: $450 / £280 / €360
- The a6000 costs around: $550 / £400 / €420
- The a6300 costs around: $750 / £580 / €800
- The a6400 costs around: $900 / £950 / €1200
- The a6500 costs around: $1200 / £980 / €1030
Summary
All five cameras are perfectly capable of taking incredible images, and if I took the same image on each camera I’d bet a considerable amount of money that you wouldn’t be able to identify correctly which camera took which image, this is how similar they are when it comes to image quality.
Moving past image quality we definitely start to see a number of clear differences between these cameras, with both the a6400 and a6500 packing in the most features.
Your decision as to which camera you buy might ultimately come down to the budget that you have available. There’s only around $100 difference in price between the a5100 and the a6000, but if you don’t need the flip-up screen then my advice would be to go for the a6000. With the a6000 you are getting the EVF which is invaluable when shooting in bright sunshine, as well as more physical controls on the body itself.
If you can stretch to the a6300 then you also get 4k video recording as well as a dust and moisture resistant body which is great if you shoot in inclement weather conditions. You’ll also get a much better AF system.
With the real-time tracking and animal AF the new a6400 really packs a solid punch, in-fact I only see a couple of real benefits to purchasing the range-topping a6500 over the a6400.
The first benefit would be for IBIS, but this is only really helpful if you are shooting handheld with lenses that don’t include OSS built-in. The second benefit is that the continuous shooting buffer in the a6500 is double the size of that in the a6400, so if you shoot a lot of sports or fast action then the a6500 might be the better choice. If neither IBIS or the larger image buffer are a concern then save yourself $300 and order the a6400.
Despite owning the a6500 I have just pre-ordered the a6400 and anticipate that my a6500 will be collecting a considerable amount of dust going forward.
Check Prices and Deals
Before You Go
It would be great to hear in the comments below which camera you own or plan to buy and your reasons for doing so. Also if you have any questions on any of the cameras please do also drop a comment below and I’ll do my best to help. Finally if you are on Facebook it would be great to see you in one of the many friendly niche Alpha Shooters Groups that I run.
Neville
My Minolta X300 with a Vivitar 28-200 zoom has served me faithfully for many years, but dammit, the film is getting expensive! Sony bought Minolta so I might as well buy a Sony. Pity they changed the mount.
Probably get the new A7R IV if I can get good money for my house otherwise an A6000.
Timothy Mayo
Hi Neville. The new a7R IV certainly look to be a pretty amazing camera, I’d love to pick one up myself at some point. I’ve owned the a7R III since release and it’s also a fantastic camera, the a7R IV just takes it to another level. I’m not an expert on Minolta glass but I know you can adapt many Minolta lenses to Sony E-mount. Take a look at this guide: https://briansmith.com/minolta-md-mc-lens-mount-adapters-sony-e-mount/ – All the best, Tim
Ashley
Me? I’m poor. I mean, I have a wife, a couple of step children, and my girlfriends all have children and parents and all like that who need to have their next meals, and I have an expensive motorcycle that goes very fast, and a pickup, and several houses, and all that shit costs money. (I’ll leave it to you to decide how much of that might be true.) But hey, too… Real wages in the US have been stagnant for 40-50 years, and people be working multiple jobs to try and pay their rent. And immigrants and refugees and yada yada yada. I mean, ya’ll have been paying attention, yes? And so here comes Sony… This one has IBIS, the others don’t. This one has the bestest, fastest auto focus. This one takes pics the fastest. This one has a newly designed processor. This one supports 4K video. This one is weather proof. These three overheat. This one doesn’t have a flippy screen. So where’s the one camera with IBIS, the fastest autofocus, the fastest shutter speed, the new processor, 4K video, weather proofing, doesn’t overheat, and has a flippy screen, all together in one camera? Is that like the a7 VI or a8 VII or something, running only $5-10,000US, plus lenses?
In Thailand, where I live, the APS-C Alpha series runs from about $400US for the a5100, to a minimum of $1,516US for the a6500. And then, all of Sony’s “affordable” lenses are just mediocre, and not particularly affordable (I have two Sony lenses; my “best” lens is a completely manual Chinese 7Artisans 25mm f/1.8 that I paid about $70US for). So let me think… Do I want to pay $400US for an APS-C camera, or $1,516US? I dunno… How much money do I need to keep aside for crappy lenses?
So there are these factors, coupled with the fact that I am not in favor of continuously maxing out my credit cards, coupled with the fact that I am a hobbyist, and not a “professional.” But these are all “great cameras for beginners!”, right? I mean, if you believe all the camera review articles that turn up in search results. The a5100 is a great camera for beginners! So a6500 owners look down on a5100 owners? But then. the a6500 is a great camera for beginners! The a6400 is a great camera for beginners! Reminds me Oh So Much of motorcycle reviews… Every large displacement motorcycle seems a “great motorcycle for beginners!” Which contributes to snobbery amongst motorcyclists… “The Ducati Diavel 1260 is an excellent motorcycle for beginners!” (Runs much slower than my smaller and less expensive Yamaha, but what the heck… Both bikes far exceed the abilities of beginners, never mind all the motorcycle mag reviews. Or all the camera mag reviews.) Anyway… I’m absolutely certain that the Sony a7r iii is an “excellent camera for beginners.” There must be 4-5 reviews around that will tell me such…
I am not a professional photographer (nor a professional motorcyclist). I will never win any contests in photography (or motorcycling) except by accident (I did once win a photo contest! But I was unaware I had entered. 🙂 ). I am not rich, and I am not stoopid. I went for the cheapo a5100… Smallest and lightest of the bunch. Something I don’t have to have a backpack to haul around. (Indeed, I carry it in a neoprene case on my belt when out traveling on the motorcycle.. Something that I can just flip up and snap a photo at a moment’s notice. If it should fall off, oh well, kinda…) I do not require IBIS, as Sony lenses provide in-lens stabilization, but even the 7Artisans lens doesn’t really need it. And seems to me that the a5100 fires off photos rapidly enough. 4K video? How much disk space and CPU power is much of that going to require? Because 1080p requires quite a bit. Nope… The a5100 is plenty enough for me.
The most important features of my a5100: it has the same sensor as all the others, and I paid cash for the thing. No credit cards. No B&H financing. Cash. The second most important feature is your comment, “if I took the same image on each camera I’d bet a considerable amount of money that you wouldn’t be able to identify correctly which camera took which image, this is how similar they are when it comes to image quality.”
I do confess that I sometimes lay awake at night, wondering whether having the best EVF (or any EVF) would help me win more of the photo contests I never enter. Would my photos look better if I had the best of all possible autofocus mechanisms? (Can the 55-210 zoom even focus at full zoom?) What about if I were able to burst 25 frames per second instead of only 6-7? Gosh… If I had only charged a more expensive camera and set of lenses to my credit card… Life would be so much better!
Another “minor” concern: these things are actually electronics. That is, they will crap out, and often do. I damn near had heart failure when I found out how much it would cost to repair my Sony RX100. So how much are you going to be willing to shell out when it comes time to repair your a5100? How about for your a6500? Your a7r iii? I dunno, of course. Except that with an a5100, I might be willing to just chuck it and go buy another one. Maybe used, on eBay or something?
I do actually have one complaint about the a5100… While 1080p (XAVS-C or whatever it’s called, 50p) is plenty good enough, the camera is prone to overheating after a while. But I’ve managed to deal with that well enough, I guess… I’ve installed a “ProGrade” 64Gb high speed memory card (about $50US), and too, am using a “dummy battery” with an external battery bank, such as those used for mobile phones. I also cut away part of the dummy battery so that heat might be better vented. It’s difficult to determine the camera’s CPU load under different conditions, but for whatever reason (things read here and there), I’ve come to believe that the camera processor’s load is lower when shooting at ISO 200 and 800. The “OpenMemories-Tweak app has been installed, removing the 29:50 video recording limit. Regardless, I am routinely able to make videos of 35-45 minutes in length, and too, I’ve been able to make videos of 2 hours, 44 minutes in length at ISO 200 and 800. Difficult to complain, then, since all I really want is for it not to decide to shut off unexpectedly.
I am extremely happy with the a5100, especially because it seems such a frugal purchase (frugal me). For all you folks who have credit cards and need something better — I recommend the Sony a7r iii, and be sure to buy only the BEST lenses. Nothing but the best for you folks! Tell me all about your camera’s virtues! I promise.. I will smile all the while. 🙂
Vern Southard
Definitely relate, quite funny rant, I just went for the a6000, six year old model. Does what I need to do. Sony top quality lenses cost way too much, glad there are 3rd party lens makers.
pioneervalley
I own the Sony a6000 and have been waiting for a significant reason to upgrade to a better model. If Image quality is about the same, I don’t see a big incentive to upgrade. The tech companies (including Apple with with iPhone X) appear to be running out of ideas that really matter and that impact most users. I have found there is a lot to learn with the other aspects of photography that matter more to me. I’m talking about learning more skills with Photoshop and apps Google photos. I’m getting more bang for the buck and with my time in venturing out in these other area than in incremental upgrades with cameras that make little difference in the images. My two cents.
Timothy Mayo
There maybe a small improvement in low light image quality and noise reduction, but if you don’t shoot in low light conditions than you are unlikely to see any benefits. I’m fortunate to now own both cameras so I will be comparing the image quality soon. The main benefit of the a64000 over the a6000 is really the AF performance, Real-Time Eye AF, and upcoming Animal Eye AF, along with the much larger buffer if you shoot continuously. But if you aren’t shooting a lot of sports, action, or wildlife, then you may as well stick with the a6000 and like you say, invest your time and money in developing your skills or travelling to new places. Happy shooting!
Jean Chastain
I purchased the Sony a6400 and returned. I own the Sony a6000 and saw no difference in image quality which is my main concern. I am sure the Sony a6400 has more features than the Sony a6000 but If image quality is your main concern save your money and stick to the Sony a6000.