Mixed A few from last week

Paul stuart

Well Known Member
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Followers
4
Following
0
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Posts
478
Likes Received
912
Elmley (1 of 3).jpg
  • ILCE-1
  • 500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024
  • 500.0 mm
  • ƒ/5.6
  • 1/800 sec
  • ISO 1250
Elmley (1 of 5).jpg
  • ILCE-7RM5
  • FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS
  • 600.0 mm
  • ƒ/6.3
  • 1/1600 sec
  • ISO 250
Elmley (2 of 5).jpg
  • ILCE-7RM5
  • FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS
  • 600.0 mm
  • ƒ/6.3
  • 1/4000 sec
  • ISO 1600
bittern (1 of 1).jpg
  • ILCE-1
  • 500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024
  • 500.0 mm
  • ƒ/5.6
  • 1/1000 sec
  • ISO 1600
Elmley (1 of 1).jpg
  • ILCE-1
  • 500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024
  • 500.0 mm
  • ƒ/5.6
  • 1/1600 sec
  • ISO 2500
Elmley (2 of 3).jpg
  • ILCE-1
  • 500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024
  • 500.0 mm
  • ƒ/5.6
  • 1/800 sec
  • ISO 100
Elmley (3 of 5).jpg
  • ILCE-7RM5
  • FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS
  • 600.0 mm
  • ƒ/6.3
  • 1/1000 sec
  • ISO 400
 
Nice selection Paul. Have you taken that Sigma off since getting it :D
 
Nice selection Paul. Have you taken that Sigma off since getting it :D
yes look at the metadata in fact i sometimes still shoot with 200-600mm especially if i am not hiking or walking kilometers ,the 500 is easier to hand hold which helps also it is has great rendering i doubt once cropped it is a noticeable iq difference over the 200-600 if matched it handles poor light better and backlight situations ,same with the 300mm f2.8 with 2x no noticeable difference over the 200-600mm in sharpness ,i have just watched you tube guy ollie https://youtu.be/KxNvZnplMaU?si=mIiarRaE7f3chzRd of course the primes have some advantage especially the 300 mm with f2.8 and bokeh
 
Back
Top