Give an old camera a new life? Maybe infrared photography?

[FowlersFreeTime]

4 years ago I gave my old a6000 to my mum, she has not used it once. She is absolutely addicted to the instant gratification of cellphone photography and sharing on facebook or whatsapp with family. So I think this Christmas I'm going to take it back. I know that sounds bad, but trust me, she won't miss it.

I'm kind of curious to try infrared photography, and I thought that maybe bringing this old camera body home and getting it converted would be a fun experiment. Looks like that would cost me around $300, which will eat into my savings for another lens, but perhaps it would be a better learning opportunity than simply trading it in for a few quick bucks.

Who here has done it? thoughts? guidance?

 

[Alan Clark]

My A7R came to me converted to full spectrum and I use it for infrared with Kolari clip-in filters, mostly mono (some of my images are on this site). I love the effect of dark skies and white foliage - some images do not work as well in visible light. If you also like the effect then I can recommend it. One drawback is that it is more weight to carry around if you also want to shoot in visible light as well.

 

[FowlersFreeTime]

My A7R came to me converted to full spectrum and I use it for infrared with Kolari clip-in filters, mostly mono (some of my images are on this site). I love the effect of dark skies and white foliage - some images do not work as well in visible light. If you also like the effect then I can recommend it. One drawback is that it is more weight to carry around if you also want to shoot in visible light as well.

My main camera is an A6700, so carrying a modified a6000 body wouldn't be too much bulk, plus both bodies can use the same lenses.
I think I need to do more research because I don't even understand which options to choose:

Sony Mirrorless Infrared Conversion

With this conversion service we will replace the internal hot mirror filter with a high quality custom made infrared glass filter. This will allow your camera to capture infrared light instead of visible light. After IR conversion you won't need any filters in front of the lens and the camera...

www.lifepixel.com

470nm? 720nm?

 

[Alan Clark]

I am surprised that they don't do a full-spectrum conversion, but 470nm is the closest, only blocking ultraviolet and extreme violet. This would give you flexibility in your choice of filter - you can shoot colour images using the red end of the visible spectrum, or all infrared, or far infrared. If you choose 720nm then you are restricted to infrared only, so only pick that if you are certain that you do not want to record visible light at all.

 

[FowlersFreeTime]

I really like the ones you shared recently (south bank, skyscrapers, Westminster). I guess my confusion is that I really like these monochromatic shots, but the different wavelength ratings don't mean much to me yet, maybe as you suggest I would do 470nm. Going to watch a whole boat load of videos on the topic.