Pro Member
- Followers
- 5
- Following
- 0
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
- Posts
- 846
- Likes Received
- 1,452
- Name
- David Lewis
- Country
- United States
- City/State
- Delaware
- CC Welcome
- Yes
Last year I ended my Adobe subscription (which had its own issues) but I like to have some options when it comes to editing so I thought that I would give Luminar Neo a try to go along with CapOne. Lets just say that I have some mixed feelings.
The good:
- Easy to load files
- Comes preloaded with a bunch of nice presets
- Lots of color editing options, more than Adobe has. Basically if you can't find a way to edit your colors to match your vision I'm not sure what would work for you.
- Lots of tools for sharpening, denoise, cloning that all work well
- Options for changing the lighting source direction
- Many more cool editing options that are simple to toy around with
The Bad
- It is slow
- The pano stitching tool says that you can stitch 2-100 files but I can't get a 12 image stitch to work. The Luminar support team tells me that it takes their Mac 30 mins to merge the 12 50mp images but my window PC stops trying after about 20 seconds. These same files take about 3-4 minutes in either CapOne or Adobe.
- The max exporting image size is limited to 15,000 pixel per edge
Clearly the Luminar Neo team has a lot of focus on providing new tools in their development strategy and they do a good job. If I were to compare them to other software companies I would say that they clearly do not follow the 80/20 development process of developing 80 of the feature and then maybe finishing the last 20 through support case since all the features, at least to me, seem complete. The issue that I have is that though the features work they have limited the overall performance of the software. This limitation is very frustrating to me since most seem to be made for landscape photography but the speed and limitations can greatly restrict landscape work.
I still have a couple weeks to decide if I will keep this or return for a refund.
The good:
- Easy to load files
- Comes preloaded with a bunch of nice presets
- Lots of color editing options, more than Adobe has. Basically if you can't find a way to edit your colors to match your vision I'm not sure what would work for you.
- Lots of tools for sharpening, denoise, cloning that all work well
- Options for changing the lighting source direction
- Many more cool editing options that are simple to toy around with
The Bad
- It is slow
- The pano stitching tool says that you can stitch 2-100 files but I can't get a 12 image stitch to work. The Luminar support team tells me that it takes their Mac 30 mins to merge the 12 50mp images but my window PC stops trying after about 20 seconds. These same files take about 3-4 minutes in either CapOne or Adobe.
- The max exporting image size is limited to 15,000 pixel per edge
Clearly the Luminar Neo team has a lot of focus on providing new tools in their development strategy and they do a good job. If I were to compare them to other software companies I would say that they clearly do not follow the 80/20 development process of developing 80 of the feature and then maybe finishing the last 20 through support case since all the features, at least to me, seem complete. The issue that I have is that though the features work they have limited the overall performance of the software. This limitation is very frustrating to me since most seem to be made for landscape photography but the speed and limitations can greatly restrict landscape work.
I still have a couple weeks to decide if I will keep this or return for a refund.