Site Supporter
- Followers
- 23
- Following
- 0
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
- Posts
- 4,944
- Likes Received
- 3,829
- Name
- Tim
- Country
- United States
- City/State
- SE Michigan
Yeah, 'cause that makes a HUGE difference. Honestly, $4k, $5k, $6k, whatever k. I'd have to really NEED that lens. It's such a MOR Focal length, it makes no sense to me. It may make sense to someone else, I just don't see it. I'd rather spend $3k on a 70-200 and a 1.4TC for the loss of a stop and 20mm. A lot more versatile.The existing 300mm lenses sit at around $6k, rather than $8k - I'm guessing the 300 GM will sit around there, too. I may be deluded, but I'm happy in my delusion for now
Still waiting for the "in development announcement for a 200mm f/2, too.
Last edited: